Wednesday, 4 March 2020

Ihedoha’s Application Dismissed, As Lead Supreme Court Judgment Affirms Uzodinma: Olaleye Idowu

Image result for supreme court verdict today

The Application brought before the supreme court yesterday filed by Emeka ihedioha and people’s Democratic Party seeking reversal of the apex court’s January 14, 2020 judgment which removed him as imo state governor was yesterday dismissed as lead judgment affirms uzodinma as the authentic governor of the state.
A seven-man panel of supreme court justices in a split six to one verdict on teusday, dismissed the application.
The panel was presided over by the chief justice of Nigeria, justice Tanko Mohammed

Six of the seven Justices affirmed the court’s earlier decision, while one ruled in favour of Ihedioha and the PDP.
Apart from the CJN, other justices that form the panel in the lead judgment include Justice Olukayode Ariwoola, who delivered the majority ruling of the court, others who consented to the majority decision were Justices Sylvester Ngwuta, Kudirat Kekere-Ekun, Amina Augie, and Uwani Abba-Aji,
The six Justices, along with the now retired Justice Amir Sanusi, constituted the seven-man panel that delivered the disputed January 14, 2020 judgment.
Justice Chima Nweze, who delivered the dissenting ruling, rebuked Uzodinma for allegedly misleading the apex court into declaring him the winner of the election.
Criticising his colleagues, who delivered the January 14, 2020 judgment, Justice Nweze said it was “preposterous” for the apex court to award the “electoral victory” to Uzodinma who had contended that the March 9, 2019 election was invalid.
He said, “In this circumstance, I take the humble view that this court has the inherent jurisdiction of redeeming its image by setting aside the judgment.”
His dissenting judgment drew an applause from a section of the audience in the court, but the CJN quickly warned that clapping was prohibited in court, adding that anyone caught doing so in future could be made to clap continuously for 14 days.
Delivering the lead majority judgment, Justice Olukayode Ariwoola dismissed Ihedioha’s application on the grounds that the apex court’s judgment was final and that the court could not be made to sit in appeal over its judgment.
He said, “It is settled law that this court has no power to change or alter its own judgment or sit in appeal over its own judgment.
“There is no doubt that the court has inherent powers in respect of matters within its jurisdiction, it certainly has no inherent power to assume jurisdiction in respect of a matter not within its jurisdiction.
“It is clear from the tone and the body of the instant application that what is being sought is asking the court to sit in appeal over its judgment already delivered and executed. That is certainly beyond the competence of this court.”
He recalled that only on February 26, 2020 the Supreme Court dismissed a similar application for the review of its February 13, 2020 verdict, which sacked the Bayelsa State governor-elect David Lyon of the All Progressives Congress after disqualifying the deputy governor-elect, Biobarakuma Degi-Eremienyo, for submitting false information to the Independent National Electoral Commission.
Justice Nweze, commended Agabi for having the courage to file the application for the review of the apex court’s judgment.
At the hearing earlier conducted by the court on Friday, APC’s lawyer, Damien Dodo (SAN), had urged the court to dismiss the application for offending the principle of the finality of the judgment of the court.
INEC’s lawyer, Taminu Inuwa (SAN), took a neutral position by not opposing or supporting the application.
Affirming the court’s earlier judgment, Justice Ariwoola, who reproduced part of the ruling of the apex court’s ruling, which dismissed APC’s application for the review of the judgment on Bayelsa State, said the court lacked jurisdiction to “alter or vary a judgment or an order after the delivery.
 “To set aside the judgment in this circumstance is to open the floodgate for applications by parties to review its judgments and this will, to say the least, bring the court to disrepute and ridicule.
“In the circumstance, this application is accordingly dismissed. Even though cost follows event, parties are to follow, parties are to bear their costs.”
But in his dissenting judgment, Justice Nweze held that the principle of finality of the apex court’s judgment could not “extinguish the applicants’ right to fair pronouncement of the court.”
He affirmed the Court of Appeal’s decision, which upheld Ihedioha’s victory, adding that the apex court in the January 14, 2020 judgment wrongly declared Uzodinma winner of the last governorship election.
He ordered Uzodinma to return the certificate of return issued to him by INEC.
Alluding to various irregularities in the apex court’s January 14, 2020 judgment, he said, “The reasoning in the judgment will sooner or later haunt our electoral jurisprudence.”
He said although his opinion was dissenting, “it is an appeal to the brooding spirit of the law” which might be useful in the future review of the apex court’s decision in the case.
‘Judgment, endorsement of electoral fraud’
 The Supreme Court had installed Hope Uzodinma of the All Progressives Congress as the new governor of Imo State, after declaring him the valid winner of the March 9, 2019 governorship election in the state.
Displeased with the turn of events, Ihedioha and the PDP approached the apex court, seeking the reversal of the judgment.
The panel was presided over by the Chief Justice of Nigeria, Justice Tanko Mohammad.

No comments:

Post a comment

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...